![]() ![]()
ARB/97/3, Decision on annulment, 3 July 2002, para. 4 ILC’s Articles on State responsibility Compañía de Aguas del Aconquija S.A. Something further is required… such as a denial of justice by the courts of the State…” (Comm. Under the dogmatic conception of the contract-treaty divide, “the breach by a State of a contract does not as such entail a breach of international law. The traditional conception of the contract-treaty divide ARB/07/9) dismissed BIVAC’s claim based on violation of the fair and equitable standard by reasoning that the dispute relates to mere refusal to pay invoices under a pre-shipment inspection contract and that, in doing so, Paraguay has not acted “in a manner that is qualitatively different from an ordinary contracting party.” The tribunal thus upheld the traditional distinction between mere breach of contract and treaty breach stating that “omething more than mere breach of contract is needed.” (para. In the recent Further decision on objections to jurisdiction dated Octothe tribunal in Bureau Veritas, Inspection, Valuation, Assessment and Control, BIVAC B.V. "Nicola the Queen of Scots: The story behind the fiesty SNP leader".
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |